The
article published on the website of the newspaper “The New York Times” on February 14, 2013 is headlined “The Eye is Part of the Mind:
Drawings From Life and Art by Leo Steinberg”. The article repots that now two collegial
friends of Leo Steinberg, who was a hands-on artist. , David Cohen and
Graham Nickson have selected nearly 60 of those drawings for a tribute show that is a posthumous Steinberg solo debut. Leo worked with
skill in the versatile, revisable graphite medium.
It
was revealed that his talent is obvious early, in a doe-eyed self-portrait from
the Slade years, and in a series of carefully observed and polished drawings of
a friend, Deirdre Knewstub.
The article informs us about that Steinberg was teaching art at Parsons
School of Design and warming up to write his mold-shattering contemporary art
criticism. The drawings suggest his range of interests, from
Michelangelo to Picasso. They also capture his wit, as in an ink sketch of what
looks like the morning-after of an orgy on Parnassus
or in a downtown walk-up.
I
can say that Leo Steinberg is one
of the most brilliant, influential, and controversial art historians of the
last half of the 20th century.. Steinberg’s work didn’t sit well with
everyone. While no one could deny his brilliance, some accused him of
over-reaching in his art-historical interpretations. Acutely proud of his
intellectual boldness, however, and vastly preferring going out on an imaginative
intellectual limb to confining his art history to timidly tracking the
trajectories of art and artists, Steinberg defended himself in a 1967 essay,
“Objectivity and the Shrinking Self.”
There is no link to the article in the WWW (((
ОтветитьУдалитьThere is no author of the article it is NONSENCE ! ! !
There are only few phrases which should be in rendering:
1. The article repots
2. The article informs
3. It was revealed
Valeria, you "had a few" F. Sinatra (c)
Not "I can say", use To my mind, personally I think, from my point of view, I think and so on and so force.